In a case marked by legal irregularities and troubling tactics, Attorney Joshua Harshberger has filed yet another contempt motion against Sara. This move is not just another legal maneuver—it is part of a much larger, deeply concerning pattern of illegal actions and conspiracy aimed at undermining Sara’s legal rights to her children. Despite the clear fact that Bruce has never had legal standing for rights to the children, Harshberger continues to push forward with his contempt motion. And perhaps most alarmingly, there seems to be a coordinated effort between Harshberger and Judge Menges to harm the children and deny Sara the full legal rights to which she is entitled.
The Heart of the Case: A Web of Conspiracy and Legal Abuse
At the core of this case lies a fundamental truth: Bruce has never had standing to be granted any legal rights to the children. Any legal claims he has made are completely baseless. Yet, despite this, Harshberger continues to represent Bruce’s interests, and the interest of a convicted child sex offender, Kristoffer Hexter, filing motions against Sara under the guise of enforcing some nonexistent legal right.
What’s more, it has been made abundantly clear in court that Sara has full legal rights to her children. She is the rightful and legal parent, and there is no valid legal argument to the contrary. Yet, Harshberger, alongside Judge Menges, continues to ignore these basic legal truths, manipulating the court system to create obstacles that have no basis in law.
This isn’t simply a case of legal incompetence or oversight—this is a deliberate conspiracy between Harshberger and Judge Menges to harm Sara and, more disturbingly, the children. By filing contempt motions and pushing forward with a case that should never have progressed this far, they are engaging in a concerted effort to strip Sara of her rights and place the children in a position of harm.
Judge Menges and Attorney Harshberger: A Dangerous Alliance
It is no secret that legal cases are often shaped by the actions of judges and attorneys, but what’s happening in this case goes beyond typical legal strategy—it raises serious ethical and legal questions about collusion and conspiracy.
Attorney Harshberger’s repeated filing of contempt motions, despite the fact that Bruce does not have standing and the case is under appeal, suggests a troubling agenda. The reality is that Bruce should never have been allowed to bring this case forward, yet Harshberger has persistently ignored these facts and has continued to use the legal system to exert pressure on Sara.
Perhaps even more disturbing is the role of Judge Menges, who has consistently ruled in a way that disregards the facts of the case and fails to uphold the law. The judge’s rulings have been inconsistent with the reality that Sara has full legal custody and rights to the children. Instead, Judge Menges appears to be enabling Harshberger’s motions, despite their lack of legal foundation, which only deepens the sense that there is a coordinated effort to harm Sara and her children.
This raises serious questions: How could a judge—who is sworn to uphold the law—ignore the established facts of the case and consistently rule in a way that seems designed to benefit Bruce, despite his total lack of standing? The pattern of rulings strongly suggests that there is something more sinister at play.
The Impact on Sara and the Children
The real victims in this case are Sara and her children. While the court system is supposed to protect children and ensure their best interests are met, this case has seen Sara subjected to relentless legal harassment. The contempt motions filed by Harshberger are designed to put her on the defensive, creating legal barriers that should not exist, and ultimately putting her children’s well-being at risk.
Sara, who has done nothing wrong and is the legal and rightful parent, has been forced to spend precious time and energy fighting an entirely baseless case. Meanwhile, Bruce, who has no legal claim to the children, continues to be allowed by the court system to perpetuate this harm. This is a case where the legal system is being used not to protect the children, but to weaken their family structure and harm the very person who is protecting them.
The Illegal Nature of the Entire Case
This case is not only unjust—it is illegal. The foundation of the case is built on a lie: that Bruce has standing to make claims regarding the children, when in fact, he has no legal right to do so. The entire premise of the case is flawed and should never have gone to court in the first place. But what makes this situation even more egregious is the role that Attorney Harshberger and Judge Menges have played in allowing this to continue.
Their actions go beyond poor judgment—they represent a clear conspiracy to deprive Sara of her legal rights and harm her children. By allowing Bruce’s baseless claims to continue, and by enabling motions that have no legal merit, Harshberger and Judge Menges are acting outside the bounds of the law and, in doing so, placing the children at risk.
Conclusion: The Need for Accountability
The time has come for accountability. This case should never have gone this far. The actions of Attorney Harshberger and Judge Menges are not just a series of legal missteps—they are part of a coordinated effort to harm Sara and her children. The legal system should serve to protect the innocent, but in this case, it is being weaponized against those who are trying to do right by their family.
It is clear that Sara has the full legal rights to her children and that Bruce’s claims have no merit. As this case continues to unfold, the courts must take a hard look at the actions of those involved, and bring an end to this conspiracy before it causes further harm to the children and to justice itself.