In recent months, Bruce has been involved in a legal battle over forced access to children, even though he has no established relationship with them. His actions have raised serious questions about his motivations, especially when it comes to a child he’s claiming is his granddaughter, despite no familial connection. Below, we’ve compiled ten probing questions to better understand his actions and the reasons behind his relentless push for court-ordered access.
1. Bruce, why are you fighting so hard to gain access to children with whom you’ve never had any meaningful relationship?
Given that you’ve had no established bond with these children, what exactly motivates you to pursue legal action for court-ordered visitation?
2. Why are you claiming that a young girl is your granddaughter when there’s no evidence to support that relationship?
It’s been made clear that she’s not biologically related to you—what’s your reasoning for insisting otherwise?
3. Is your desire for access to these children in any way related to your son, who has been convicted of multiple accounts of abusive behavior?
Is there a connection between your legal fight and the fact that your son has a history of troubling behavior with these children, and other children?
4. Given the circumstances, do you believe that the court should force children to have contact with someone who has no direct familial bond to them?
How do you justify asking a judge to mandate a relationship with children who have no established connection to you?
5. How do you plan to explain your relationship—or lack thereof—to the children since you’re granted forced access?
What do you say to the children when they question your presence in their lives, especially when they have no previous connection to you?
6. Have you considered the emotional impact on the children of being forced into a relationship with someone they don’t know?
Why do you not care that your actions are causing further harm and confusion to these vulnerable children?
7. Why do you insist on pursuing access to children who have expressed no desire for contact with you?
What makes you think that a legal order is the right way to establish a relationship with children who clearly don’t want it?
8. Do you have any concerns about the potential for your actions to be perceived as using the legal system for personal gain, rather than for the children’s well-being?
Could it be that your push for court-mandated access is more about you than about the children’s best interests?
9. Why do you not care that the children express discomfort or fear when being forced into a relationship with you?
The children struggle with the idea of spending time with you, why did you not address their concerns. Why do you not care for protecting their emotional safety?
10. Finally, can you honestly say that your fight for these children has no connection with your son, and is entirely about what’s best for the children involved?
Is it possible that your actions are motivated by something deeper, such as your son trying to maintain control, or other personal grievances, rather than genuine concern for the children’s well-being?
Bruce’s aggressive pursuit of court-ordered access to children with whom he has no prior relationship raises serious questions about his motivations. These questions are about trying to understanding what’s truly behind his actions. When the legal system is involved in such delicate matters, it’s crucial that every step taken is in the best interest of the children—questions like these are vital to ensure that no one is misusing their position for personal or emotional gain.