Author Archives: N. Murray

In a baffling turn of events, Bruce himself provided evidence of him lying to law enforcement officers and withholding critical proof that the children’s mother, Sara, was supposed to have custody of her children. Despite eventually being compelled by law enforcement to hand over the children, Bruce’s actions amount to multiple alleged felonies under Pennsylvania law. To add to the unusual nature of this case, Bruce reportedly included the police report detailing his own misleadingContinue reading “Bruce’s Legal Deception: Withholding Evidence, Lying to Law Enforcement, and the Question of Accountability in Pennsylvania”

Judge Christopher Menges is at the center of a highly controversial legal case that has now gained international attention raises serious questions about his judicial conduct. Despite overwhelming evidence suggesting that the case has no legal standing, that his decisions are infringing on the rights of vulnerable children, and that his actions may be violating legal and ethical standards, Judge Menges continues to preside over the proceedings. Below are 10 crucial questions that demand immediateContinue reading “10 Critical Questions for Judge Christopher Menges: A Call for Accountability in a Questionable Case”

Attorney Joshua Harshberger has been representing Bruce Hexter in a legal matter that has raised significant ethical and legal questions. His involvement in a case that many argue has no legal foundation and is violating the rights of a mother and her children has brought his professional conduct into sharp focus. Below are 10 pointed questions that demand answers, especially given the potential review by a conduct board. These questions aim to uncover why HarshbergerContinue reading “10 Critical Questions for Attorney Joshua Harshberger: Accountability and Ethical Concerns in the Pursuit of an Unwarranted Case”

In recent months, Bruce has been involved in a legal battle over forced access to children, even though he has no established relationship with them. His actions have raised serious questions about his motivations, especially when it comes to a child he’s claiming is his granddaughter, despite no familial connection. Below, we’ve compiled ten probing questions to better understand his actions and the reasons behind his relentless push for court-ordered access. 1. Bruce, why areContinue reading “10 Hard-Hitting Questions for Bruce: What’s Behind the Push for Court-Ordered Access to Children?”

In cases of domestic violence (DV) and child abuse, it’s often difficult to untangle the web of manipulation and control that perpetrators weave, even after they’ve been convicted. For Sara, a survivor who has fought relentlessly to protect her children and escape a toxic, abusive relationship, the battle is far from over. Despite his conviction and imprisonment, the man who caused her immense pain still controls much of her life—and continues to put her childrenContinue reading “The Hidden Force Behind Sara’s Continued Abuse: The Man Pulling the Strings. Kristoffer “Rusty” Hexter”

In the complex and often heart-wrenching world of family law, there are cases that raise serious questions about the motives behind certain individuals seeking visitation rights with children. One such case involves Bruce Hexter, a man with no biological connection to one of the children in question, yet he is fighting for visitation rights. His actions beg the question: Is Bruce Hexter’s desire for visitation truly motivated by concern for the children, or is thisContinue reading “Is Bruce Hexter’s Motive for Visitation Genuine or Part of a Bigger, More Sinister Plot?”

In a case marked by legal irregularities and troubling tactics, Attorney Joshua Harshberger has filed yet another contempt motion against Sara. This move is not just another legal maneuver—it is part of a much larger, deeply concerning pattern of illegal actions and conspiracy aimed at undermining Sara’s legal rights to her children. Despite the clear fact that Bruce has never had legal standing for rights to the children, Harshberger continues to push forward with hisContinue reading “Uncovering a Legal Conspiracy: Attorney Joshua Harshberger, Judge Menges, and the Ongoing Battle Against Sara’s Parental Rights”

In Pennsylvania, grandparents can seek intervention primarily through dependency cases, particularly when a child is determined to be dependent due to parental incapacity, neglect, or other serious issues. This legal avenue is outlined in the Pennsylvania Juvenile Act and related statutes.  Bruce Hexter filed a Petition for Grandparent Intervention in this case. He did NOT file for grandparent visitation, yet this case is being treated as if he did. There is a stark difference inContinue reading “Legal Standing for Grandparent Intervention in Pennsylvania.  Understanding where Sara’s case went wrong.”

Why Your Story Matters Every story matters. When victims of family court corruption share their experiences, it creates a tapestry of narratives that showcases the widespread nature of the issue. These stories help others understand the challenges faced within the family court system and provide a sense of solidarity among those affected. Anonymity and Safety We understand that sharing your story can feel terrifying, especially when considering the potential backlash from those in power. That’sContinue reading “The Power of Sharing Your Story: Raising Awareness and Establishing Patterns”

The courtroom can often feel like a maze, especially for those seeking justice in cases involving domestic violence and child custody. However, in our study group, we’ve identified concerning patterns in Judge Menges’ approach that warrant a closer look. These patterns, which emerge repeatedly across numerous cases, suggest a troubling consistency that raises serious questions about the fairness of proceedings. 1. Ignoring Evidence and Procedural Oversights One striking pattern is Judge Menges’ tendency to overlookContinue reading “Unveiling Patterns in Judge Menges’ Courtroom: A Call for Awareness”

In any legal system, the role of a judge is paramount. A good judge not only interprets the law but also ensures that justice is served fairly and impartially. Judicial integrity is the cornerstone of this role, embodying the principles of fairness, transparency, and accountability. This blog explores how a good judge operates and the importance of maintaining judicial integrity. 1. Impartiality and Fairness A good judge approaches each case without bias or preconceived notions.Continue reading “The Role of a Good Judge: Upholding Judicial Integrity”

Contempt of court is a powerful legal concept that underscores the importance of maintaining respect and order within the judicial system. It refers to actions that show disrespect for the court or obstruct the administration of justice. Understanding the distinctions between civil and criminal contempt, as well as the requirements for each, is crucial for anyone engaged in legal proceedings or interested in the justice system. What is Contempt of Court? Contempt can broadly beContinue reading “Understanding Contempt: Civil and Criminal Categories”

Navigating the legal system can be daunting, especially when it comes to appeals in civil cases. This post aims to break down the appeal process in simple terms, and how it applies to Sara’s case. An appeal is a request made to a higher court to review and change the decision of a lower court. In civil cases, this often occurs when one party believes that the judge made a legal mistake that affected theContinue reading “Understanding Appeals in Civil Cases: A Simple Breakdown”

Unlike criminal law where there are clearly defined discretionary limitations, family law typically allows more discretionary choice to a judge However, even with this being said, there are certain aspects of family law that do not allow much discretionary range. We will break down how a civil court case should typically proceed. Standing. As stated in a previous article, standing is the ability of a party to bring a claim to be heard by theContinue reading “Understanding Discretion in Family Law: A Deep Dive into a Recent Case.”